OUR FATHER WHO CONFOUNDS THE WISE
The pharisees and the reps from Herodˋs court had come with the question of taxation and after they had left, a contigency of a sect of temple leaders called the Saddusees approached Jesus with a disingenous question. The Saddusees did not believe in the ressurection and yet their question was about who a woman would be married to (having been married to multiple brothers as each died and the next married her ) when she ressurected. Matthew chapter 22 verses 23 - 33 records this encounter with Jesus;
23 The same day the Sadducees, who say there is no resurrection, came to Him and asked Him, 24 saying: “Teacher, Moses said that if a man dies, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife and raise up offspring for his brother. 25 Now there were with us seven brothers. The first died after he had married, and having no offspring, left his wife to his brother. 26 Likewise the second also, and the third, even to the seventh. 27 Last of all the woman died also. 28 Therefore, in the resurrection, whose wife of the seven will she be? For they all had her.”
29 Jesus answered and said to them, “You are mistaken, not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God. 30 For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels of God in heaven. 31 But concerning the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was spoken to you by God, saying, 32 ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? God is not the God of the dead, but of the living.” 33 And when the multitudes heard this, they were astonished at His teaching.
The questioners presumed that people remained married to each other after the ressurection and so the connumdrum they placed before Jesus was how people who were legally married to multiple people in this life would be assiged to a partner in the ressurected life.
To the questioners, this connundrum was an airtight argument against the ressurection because the legallity of multiple marriages in the earth would cause an intractable mess in heaven after the ressurection when the multiple marriages would have to run concurrently which was not lawful. The question turned on how a fair decision could be made to assign a woman to a particular a man when she was legally linked to other men.
Jesus responded to this question in two parts. First He nullified the connundrum by informing the questioners that their primary point of fact was wrong. Whereas they thought that marriages continued in the afterlife, Jesus corrected their misconception by telling them that at the ressurection, marriages would not continue. He authoritatively told them that human beings, once in ressurected, would be like the ˋangels of Godˋ who neither married nor were given in marriage.
This information provided a revealing glimpse into the afterlife where men and women, now immortal beings, were no longer legally linked by marital on earth. In marriage, men and women are joined together in one flesh but with the destruction of the flesh upon the resurection, there is nothing that continues to be joined and each individual is a free standing entity in God.
The second part of Jesusˋ response nullified the doctrine of the Saddusees that held that there was no ressurection by using scriptures such as Exodus chapter 3 verse 15, that reads as follows;
God also said to Moses, “Say to the Israelites, ‘The Lord, the God of your fathers—the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob—has sent me to you.’
“This is my name forever, the name you shall call me from generation to generation.
In these texts, God refers to Himself as the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and because this declaration is made to Moses long after Abraham, Isaac and Jacob had died on earth, they were clearly in a ressurected state because God is the God of the living and referred Himself as the God of living people.
The clarification that Jesus brought to the doctrinal murkiness of the Saddusees astonished all who heard Him.
Amen.
4